Talk:Treaty of Troyes

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Kilburn London in topic "in the aftermath of the Battle of Agincourt"

Possible rename? edit

I think that the title of this page needs to be changed to include the year of the treaty. Because there is another Treaty of Troyes that occurred in 1564. Is this possible? Moonksy29 18:28, 30th May 2007 (UTC)

Isabeau declared Charles a bastard? edit

Unpopular Queen Isabeau of Bavaria agreed to the treaty declaring her son to be a bastard...

Queen Isabeau was rumored to have had an affair with the duke of Orléans and many observers viewed the treaty as confirmation of his illegitimacy

Does it mean the queen officially declared Charles a bastard? Was the illegitimacy of Charles mentioned in the treaty explicitly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Top.Squark (talkcontribs) 14:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, it was a rumour which was supported by the Burgundian and then the English side to discredit Charles VII, not an official declaration of any kind. Str1977 (talk) 22:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

References edit

There must be reference.I will add it.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Treaty of Troyes edit

To the question on where to find the original of the Treaty of Troyes, this is the answer I recd from the CALAMES search group: Bonjour, En effectuant sur le catalogue Calames la recherche suivante: "Traité de Troyes", on obtient parmi les résultats l'intitulé suivant: "Traicté de Troyes, du mariage de madame Catherine de France, fille du roy Charles VI, et Henry d'Angleterre. 1420". Il s'agit de cet original, que vous trouverez à la bibliothèque de l'Institut de France. Pour connaître les modalités de consultation, vous pouvez prendre contact avec: Institut de France. Bibliothèque 23 quai de Conti 75006 Paris tél. 01 44 41 44 10 bibliotheque@bif.univ-paris5.fr Cordialement, la cellule assistance. Cordialement, Frania W. (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

"in the aftermath of the Battle of Agincourt" edit

The article states the treaty was signed "in the aftermath of the Battle of Agincourt." I think this is a bit of a stretch, as the battle was in 1415 and the treaty was signed in 1420, a full five years later. If no one objects I'll change this to "in the aftermath of Henry V's successful military campaign in France", or similar. Kilburn London (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've made this change now. Kilburn London (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply