This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Peace Treaty with Austria, signed on 10 September1919. It was signed at St. Germain Palace in Paris. The treaty entered into effect on 16 July1920.
The above was the content of the duplicate page. <KF> 18:14, 1 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
ought to be changed to Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye (disambiguation), but without an automated process to change the links to those redirects, it is a lot of work. So I have changed them to link to this page and will leave the task to someone who has a bot and can do it easily to change all the links to point at this page before changing the redirects. --Philip Baird Shearer 12:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I removed last addition but not the German-speaking Sudetenland, because this is not an article about what was not done. Sudetenland was not only german-speaking, so the claim itself is invalid. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 15:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Rv of your rv. This article is about what was done to Austria by the treaty. The German-speaking Sudetenland was given to CS. -- Matthead DisOuß 22:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Bohemia is nothing more than the name of a region. The Sudetenland had been part of Austria for Centuries and it was indeed almost entirely German speaking (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Germans_in_western_Austro-Hungaria.gif). Please stop your nationalistic motivated omitting of facts.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I deleted the infobox because the maps were irrelevant (showing only German losses). However, it would be a good idea if someone created an infobox for this article.Ryoung122 12:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Did the United States sign it or not? The article can't seem to decide ——67.180.86.254 (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think the article is clear that the US signed but did not ratified the treaty. Those are distinct steps. --McSly (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
"In addition the negotiators on the Allied side, particularly Wilson, did not understand when speaking of self-determination that no convenient line could be drawn to separate intermingled nationalities, and that in further cases, irredentists would claim that some German or Hungarian-speaking territories had actually been theirs."
Is this a personal opinion of someone or is it really known "that the negotiators on the Allied side" and Wilson did not understand?