Talk:Treaty of Hampton Court (1562)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the antecedent to the phrase which may have appeared if the Huguenots were triumphant? I would edit it for clarity if I understood it.--Wetman (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Come again? 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:7505:447E:45EF:4760 (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Need to byword WHY the Treaty of Hampton was also known as the Treaty of Richmond edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rings highly fishy to my me. Nevertheless, whether or not foul still should be listed a byword/background as to how (this much more important than is let on) treaty came to be get to names for itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9C97:5D01:7505:447E:45EF:4760 (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic