This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What do we mean by saying that the treaty was signed "by Alexander I (with Metternich)"? What does it mean for a minister in Austrian service to sign a treaty "with" the ruler of Russia? Binabik80 (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nonsensical statement "The Treaty called for Napoleon to give up all conquests"edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This "Tready of Chaumont" is a treaty between the four warring parties against Napoleon, and there is no idea in it of demands or requests made to France. The warring parties agree not to act alone against France, but "in concert", and that the English crown is promising the continental allies of England a subsidy in money for their war efforts. So this whole chunk
The Treaty called for Napoleon to give up all conquests, thus reverting France to her pre-revolutionary borders, in exchange for a cease-fire. If Napoleon rejected the treaty, the Allies pledged to continue the war. The following day Napoleon rejected the treaty, ending his last chance of a negotiated settlement
has to go. Also the following paragraph about the Vienna Congress had to be modified thoroughly.
--L.Willms (talk) 14:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Was the United Kingdom part of The Holy Alliance? I think it was not. Also it implies the Alliance was forged at Chaumont; I believe coincidentally three members went onto create the alliance later on but that Chaumont was a much practical set of terms solely to defeat Napoleon I and any successors (as is mentioned above it was not a set of terms for a conditional peace based on the Emperor giving up sections of France that the Fourth Coalition wanted him to cede.)
.svg){kind=small}
