Talk:Treasure Planet/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

The review conducted ny the films Wikiproject was really helpful. Changes were made according to that review, which really helped the article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Very nice organization of intro

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No pics, but you can't really use any pics other than the poster

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Impressive. Add more info, and I would say that the FA is coming!

Leujohn ^(talk) 03:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)