Talk:Trask Mountain

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

white-footed deer mice edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed mention of "white-footed deer mice" because it is an ambiguous species name. --DRoll (talk) 07:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Tweeks" edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have no problem with converting the templates, I do have a problem with converting the citations. WP:CITE calls for full citations, so please do not shorten them to not full citations as you did. Also, 2008-03-29 only works if you want to use the cite templates. Otherwise, again, spell it out and link it. The citation templates (which are only crutches used for making it easier to cite sources) simplify the "retrieved" date by allowing the editor to add it in the YEAR-MONTH-DAY numerical format, but it displays in whatever the user preference calls for, as does not using the template and entering it as February 28 2008 or 28 February 2008 (which should look identical as you read this, but if you edit it you will see a difference). Just writing 2008-03-29 without any linking will display it only as 2008-03-29 no matter what a reader's preferences are set to. Aboutmovies (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic