Talk:Transport for NSW

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Mqst north in topic Merge Transport Info

Merge proposal edit

I don't think they are one and the same, one is the ministry, the other is the agency which acts below it. 04:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not certain that the Ministry of Transport still exists. I know that years ago, it used to. If you go to the current organisational structure here there is no mention of the Ministry or the Department, only the agencies and sections involved in coordination, policy, regulation, planning, and the delivery of services. If someone can find a reference that the organisation still exists, I'm happy to remove merge request. Jherschel (talk) 09:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merge Transport Info edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. Mqst north (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Transport InfoLine article has only NSW Government primary sources. It seems unusual that an organisation's phone number and website would be considered a separate entity to the organisation itself. Mqst north (talk) 22:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Against - It is a separate website from the Transport for NSW website and has a specific function which is quite different from the core function of Tranport for NSW.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Many organisations have multiple websites, each with their own function. And I'm sure TFNSW would argue that customer service is its core function. Mqst north (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support merging. The separate article fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). This article needs more information about the services managed by TfNSW and a merge of Transport InfoLine would be a good starting point. Gareth (talk) 17:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support merge. Not significant enough to warrant stand alone article. Turingway (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.