Talk:Transport Canada/Archive 1

Archive 1

Comment on Office of Energy Efficiency

I deleted this section, as it is not part of transport canada - the OEE falls under Natural Resources Canada, and the same text was repeated there. Manu (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Bias

This page has seen a number of changes that contain non-neutral references supporting or muting controversies about Transport Canada policies. While it is understood that their are two points of view on Transport Canada's implementation of SMS, these changes only make reference to the Transport Canada website, not to independent sources, and are as such inherently biased toward the departmental management line. I suspect that these changes are being made by Transport Canada personnel with the aim of promoting departmental policy. As such, I ask that this page be watched.

I agree that this page contains a number of non-neutral statements. My edits, which were reversed by editor C4AS, aim to distinguish between allegations and fact and restore neutrality.Writeclick (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

There's a bit of an edit war starting. I'm trying to determine who "Writeclick" is. Most editors have a user page that clarifies their experience and potential bias. The fact that Writeclick does not have such a page is of concern to me. C4AS (talk) 01:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I have no intention of starting an edit war. My edits aim not to stifle debate but to moderate non-neutral language and indicate where what is being stated is a matter of opinion or allegation. I would point out that C4AS has simply reversed my edits twice. In addition, C4AS does not address the substance of my edits in these comments, but focuses on me as an individual, including "trying to determine who 'Writeclick' is." I would note that this focus on me as a person rather than the substance of my edits is contrary to Wikipedia rules of engagement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Writeclick (talk • contribs) 21:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Sorry, I am still learning how to do this properly and did not sign. Signing now.Writeclick (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

NPOV commentary by user 66.225.160.9

User 66.225.160.9 has spammed this page with some highly opinionated controversies which need to be rewritten for NPOV, and either placed properly in a controversies section at the bottom of the article or broken out into a separate controversies page. Reverting edits for the second time. U47 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Why is it start?

I think this article is at least C-class, probably B-class.Njaohnt (talk) 18:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous accident reports

I have been finding Canadian accident reports on avsaf.org and archiving them

• However some have been lost, such as http://web.archive.org/web/20050411165326/http://www.avsaf.org/reports/CANADA/1990.04.30_FrontierAirLtd_1602.pdf (not archived by the wayback machine)

WhisperToMe (talk) 16:57, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Transport Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080606032412/http://www.eagle.ca:80/caj/ to http://www.eagle.ca/caj/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)