Talk:Transition Integrity Project
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Creation of Transition Integrity Project
editPlease place any comments about the page here. Prauls901 (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism to page
editThis page appears to have been vandalized. Inaccurate information was added and some of the links also seem to be altered. The links still need to be fixed. I think this page will need to be monitored to prevent this from happening again. Prauls901 (talk) 03:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- The suggestion to monitor this page may need to be revisited. Thriftycat needed to revert 2 cases of vandalism by user 50.4.126.134, and I just reverted an addition by the same user, in which a claim was made that denied the findings reported in the article itself. Mjpl (talk) 23:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjpl - I have the page on my watchlist. I don't think that any further action is needed for now, but if unconstructive editing continues, we could consider a block or protection. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Thriftycat OK. Thank you. I had considered sending you a message about this. I put the page on my watchlist too. Mjpl (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjpl - I have the page on my watchlist. I don't think that any further action is needed for now, but if unconstructive editing continues, we could consider a block or protection. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Sections Order
editAs this is a new group, maybe the wargames, and an expanded article on the entire thing, should be above the political commentary. There's a lot that has been missed from their report. The report shouldn't start with media stuff about the election.
History & Context
editI have improved this section which had some misplaced footnotes that could have cause confusion. I request the removal of the "synthesis of material" flag.
Quotation style
editI have been correcting the curly quotes in this article to straight quotes, as per our Manual of Style; see Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Quotation characters. User:Mbierman reverted my corrections, claiming "these are correct for quotes". Mbierman, please self-revert your edit, since Wikipedia style is to use straight quotes. I will wait for your response before taking any action myself. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Since you have not responded, I have restored the straight quotation marks. -- MelanieN (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)