Talk:Transformativeness

Talk

This article seems to be a copy of Derivative_works#Transformativeness. The Derivative_works section should be synopsized into a sparse wiki structure, and this article extended so that work isn't duplicated.--John Bessa (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, that's an ironic comment. Are you saying this article itself isn't sufficently transformative? Robofish (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Not to mention Transformation (law). It should probably all be merged to one location, but which? —Geoff Capp (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Merge

Transformativeness and Transformation (law) should be merged and Derivative work#Transformativeness made a WP:SUMMARY of the merged article. The patent sense can either be included in the merged article or, if the merged article is to be copyright-law specific, add a hatnote to United States patent law. jnestorius^(talk) 17:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Jnestorius, I agree. Onceinawhile (talk) 13:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

  Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Transformation (law) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)