Talk:Trans Europ Express

Trains: Passenger trains High‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	July 6, 2007

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The note below is wrong, insofar as I can understand it. Does anyone know why the TEE brand was dropped in favour of EuroCity? 87.194.10.238 (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page name edit

The TEE-Trains was called Trans Europ Express. And this name was published in timetables and an the sideboard of the cars has standing the Letterings Trans Europ Express. The lemma "Trans Europe Express" ist fault. See here: [1] and here: [2]. Rail Amateurs think this trains was named Trans Europe. But this is not right. My move was not a vandalism. I think, in a enzyklpadia must stand the right lemma of a issue an not this, was amateurs does say and think.--Mäfä 07:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC) Add on: See also here: [3]--Mäfä 07:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments by WP:Trains edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article contains good content. But it need's much more work on it. The content is needed to be arranged in apt. manner. Eg: like arranging in History, Network, Operations, Infrastructure (which includes rolling stock, signelling etc.) etc.. It can be worked on on the lines of the article, Central London Railway. Sharadbob^Talk_C 14:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unlike the example you gave, Trans Europ Express was a service, a program of coordination between railway authorities. It never built anything and never owned any infrastructure or rolling stock. SJ Morg (talk) 03:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic