Talk:Trajan/GA4
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Trillfendi in topic GA Reassessment
GA Reassessment edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The review was painfully inadequate and unsatisfactory at only 4 vague sentences about it being "well-written" and "illustrated". How can an article be Good with 7 unaddressed citation needed templates and multiple dead links? That is an immediate failure of Good Article criteria. The amount of sources doesn’t equate to Good quality (obviously). Trillfendi (talk) 21:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)