Talk:Traditional values
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2016. The result of the discussion was redirect to Social conservatism. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
[Untitled]
editSeveral of the articles that linked to this I think are actually better served by this then the redirect to Family values. The best example being the Red Lake Indian Reservation link. Other examples are that Chopin's novel was written before the buzzword "family values" and William A Donohue likely does mean this. In cases where Family values was more appropriate I've fixed it where the articles use of "traditional values" links to the "Family Values" article directly.--T. Anthony 06:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree with T. Anthony 's comments, perhaps the US political sense of the term should be deleted from this anthropology wiki and the links to the "Traditional Values" (e.g. on the page of the Heritage Foundation's page) should be changed or redirected to Family values. Petropetro (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Usage
editThe "Usage" section contains a statement that amounts to saying that aesthetic values are inherently subjective, which sounds like POV (as there is sound argument to the contary, whilst the idea of not questioning another's taste is a perculialy modern and western Individualist notion). CoyoteUK (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
fallacy of logic
editIs reproductive success of logic-ignoring humans logical or illogical? Do logicians or even wikipedians set rules for cultural systems or parents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.25.162.202 (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)