Talk:Tozama daimyō
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tozama daimyō article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
"The daimyo who submitted to the Tokugawa shogunate after the Battle of Sekigahara" tends to be interpreted as those who fought against Ieyasu, but that is not what it means. Both the Maeda and Date mentioned in the article supported him at the time of Sekigahara. Others who became tozama and supported Ieyasu were Yamanouchi Kazutoyo, Kuroda Nagamasa, Hosokawa Tadaoki, Katō Kiyomasa. At the time of the battle they were direct Toyotomi retainers, as was (in theory) Ieyasu, so his allies, not his vassals until afterwards.--Stone-turner (talk) 08:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Location of Tozama Daimyo edit
The article currently says "the Shimazu, the Mori, the Date, the Hachisuka, and the Uesugi, were based in western and northern Honshu". This is incorrect. The Shimazu were based in southern Kyushu, not western Honshu. --Westwind273 (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seeing no objection, I added Kyushu. Westwind273 (talk) 04:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
So why are the yozama daimyō as outsiders? edit
The article explains that they are treated as outsiders and how they are treated as outsiders, but not why they were seen as outsiders. Are they outsiders because they refuse to submit to the Tokugawa? Jyg (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)