Discussion
editalright, this has gone too far. individual episode articles BEFORE short summaries have even been written? -- Ned Scott 21:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- What has gone too far is your unnecesary and unwarranted interference. I am writing the summaries and a more detailed version for the articles. What is the reason you are objecting? This is being quite disruptive. --Cat out 00:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's a very tender subject on Wikipedia, you clearly should have discussed this first. No, you didn't HAVE TO, but if you really wanted to work with other editors and get their opinions, then it would have been a very good idea. -- Ned Scott 04:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't there be a page for every Simpsons character, and even a table listing every episode, all neatly crosslinked and introduced by a shorter central page like the above? Why shouldn't every episode name in the list link to a separate page for each of those episodes, with links to reviews and trivia? Why shouldn't each of the 100+ poker games I describe have its own page with rules, strategy, and opinions? Hard disks are cheap. --Jimbo Wales
- Ned I will not discuss every edit I make with you as per WP:Bold. I really want to work with other editors. Which doesnt require me to ask for aproval. Please stop discussing me as per WP:NPA. Article talk pages are to discuss the contribution to articles not contributors themselves --Cat out 19:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's a very tender subject on Wikipedia, you clearly should have discussed this first. No, you didn't HAVE TO, but if you really wanted to work with other editors and get their opinions, then it would have been a very good idea. -- Ned Scott 04:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)