Talk:Torp station

Torp station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 15, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 13, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after being closed in 1978, Sandefjord Airport Station reopened in 2008 with a new name to serve Sandefjord Airport, Torp, Norway?

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 47, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sandefjord Airport Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 01:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Comments:

The first two sentences of the second paragraph of the lead both begin with "The station". Change one of them to avoid repetition.

Other than that, the article looks good, and I will put it on hold pending the above fix. ---Dough 48 72 01:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. Thank you for the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 16:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic