This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toronto Star article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Atkinson principles edit
I don't think that it's revelant for this article to include a bulleted list containing the full five Atkinson principles. I think that mentioning their existance (such as in the sentance currently before the bulleted list) would be sufficent. Would anyone disagree with the removal of the list? If so, can we discuss why? Clovermoss (talk) 12:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- Reading over that section initially I agreed with you, but now I think it is relevant for them to be here since the paper was guided by those principles. Canterbury Tail talk 12:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- I definitely think we should keep them. They seem pretty fundamental to how the paper operates and they are sourced. —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Image edit
I think this would make an appropriate image for the infobox since it shows the lack of bounds of the Star. Would anybody be opposed to this? https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/TorontoStar.jpeg 2001:1970:4AE5:A300:D426:EBD1:AC63:C805 (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)