Talk:Topological graph theory

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:200:C000:1A0:ADE7:E1E3:C288:E288 in topic Pappus graph animation should be removed

Example studies edit

I know this article should more closely follow the house style for a mathmatics article. In that case this section would be next to last before the references section. The next step is to include a more formal definition of this hybrid specialty between topology and graph theory. Vonkje 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

References Section edit

I added a references section to hold footnotes that were embedded in previous sections. I believe footnoting that binds specific parts of the text to its reference is better scholarship than listing references. Simply listing references makes it harder for someone else to check my work. Vonkje 01:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Irreducible edit

Is there a notion of irreducible graphs (and trees) in terms of topology (rather than series-reduction in terms of vertices having exactly two links)? Cesiumfrog (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pappus graph animation should be removed edit

The Pappus graph animation is not well done.

It is impossible to understand what is happening, and at the end it allows no time at all for the viewer to appreciate the final result.

As it is, it does not belong in this article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:ADE7:E1E3:C288:E288 (talk) 01:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply