Talk:Too Short discography
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Lajbi in topic Gold/Platinum certification
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Gold/Platinum certification edit
According to http://www.riaa.com/gp/database/default.asp some of the gold/platinum certifications listed here are incorrect... should be as follows
- Born to Mack - Gold
- Life Is... Too Short - Multi-Platinum
- Short Dog's in the House - Platinum
- Shorty the Pimp - Platinum
- Get In Where You Fit In - Platinum
- Cocktails - Platinum
- Gettin' It - Platinum
- Can't Stay Away - Gold
- You Nasty - Gold
I'm hesitant to update the list for two reasons
- The table provided by RIAA.com simply lists the certification, not the sales numbers. So, for example, if I were to change Short Dog's In The House from Gold to Platinum, it would look weird because the sales number would still be under 1 million.
- As far as I can tell, there is no direct link to the list of Too $hort's album certifications on RIAA.com. The link I provided above gets you to a page where you can type in his name and get the results... but that doesn't really lend itself to good reference citing.
Thoughts?
- ENDelt260 19:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, let's see.
- The certifications are awarded after the amount of copies SHIPPED not the actual number of copies SOLD. So if Too $hort delivered one million to Wallmart, but only sold 90.000 it is not his problem but Wallmart's. So feel free to correct the platinum/gold statuses whenever you want.
- Every time I try to search the database of RIAA it says There was a problem with your submission, please try again and it's been for a half an year that it keeps dropping that error message for me. But if you swear your life that it works for you just link the /default URL, it have to be enough for the others to verify the certifications. It was me who couldn't reach their data so I calculated the retail shipments according to sales but it's not appropriate. Lajbi Holla @ me 09:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, let's see.
- That's weird about the error. I know you have to search for "Too Short" as opposed to "Too $hort" to get the results... but, even if I use the dollar sign I just get zero results, no error.
- FWIW, here's a link to a screen cap of the results I get. Guess I'll go ahead and update the certifications.
- ENDelt260 17:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. I tried both with Mozilla and IE but still doesn't work. Maybe we should link the imagheshack page for the others with similar problems. Do they store the picture for a longer period? Does it get deleted after a while? Lajbi Holla @ me 19:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure how long imageshack stores the image. I can add it to the references. Just didn't know if a screencap of a website counted as a 'source' as far as wikipedia was concerned. ENDelt260 21:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Heh... apparently there's a bot that runs around deleting imageshack links... so, I don't guess that'll last as a reference. ENDelt260 21:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for trying. Lajbi Holla @ me 21:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Heh... apparently there's a bot that runs around deleting imageshack links... so, I don't guess that'll last as a reference. ENDelt260 21:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure how long imageshack stores the image. I can add it to the references. Just didn't know if a screencap of a website counted as a 'source' as far as wikipedia was concerned. ENDelt260 21:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. I tried both with Mozilla and IE but still doesn't work. Maybe we should link the imagheshack page for the others with similar problems. Do they store the picture for a longer period? Does it get deleted after a while? Lajbi Holla @ me 19:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
