Mowbray should not be counted as an Ipswich manager

edit

As he was only a caretaker, Mowbray should not be counted as one of Ipswich Town's managers. - blaggers 9 Jan 08

Article consists of

edit

sacked thank god bring in mark hughes. Perhaps it should be deleted? 86.43.110.186 (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC) Back to normal again. 86.43.110.186 (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I rv some well-intentioned but inappropriate POV and OR. Quis separabit? 17:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Updates

edit

Hope no-one minds, but I've just changed the section on Tony's Middlesbrough playing career so it reads a little nicer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.9.188.22 (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Photo

edit

Is there a better photo of Mowbray that can be used? No offense, but he looks terrible. The guy is 48 years old and he looks like he's 78 or so in this photo. Quis separabit? 17:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Tony Mowbray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply