Talk:Tone hole

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 50.89.71.42 in topic shape


Science

edit

The description of the effect of holes on the vibratory column of open-ended pipes is incomplete to the point of inaccuracy. Any physics mavens out there? JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

E.g., tone holes reduce the diameter as well as the width of the vibratory column. JacquesDelaguerre (talk) 03:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

It seems that User:Hyacinth proposed a possible merge of the articles Saxophone tone hole and Saxophone. No reason was given that I can find.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose Although the tone hole article is short (it's a stub) it's good enough to me. Adding it to the main article would appear clumsy and increase clutter.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

There are actually two articles which "saxophone tone hole" was suggested to be merged into. Hyacinth (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

shape

edit

should discuss shape -- circular vs. non-circular — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.71.42 (talk) 04:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)Reply