Talk:Tom King (Emmerdale)

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 91.95.6.80 in topic Informal style of the article

Tom King Page : Improvements edit

What are your thoughts on how to improve this page? I've updated it with recent events (wedding to Rosemary etc), but what else can be added?

Sjc07 23:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why does my edit on the page disappear?

Because you added it without a source. Your attempt at sourcing was "Seen the information on the internet" which is completely useless and laughable. You need to add the actual websites and links to prove the information you add is true. 11:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TomKing.png edit

 

Image:TomKing.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Kings River Explosion.jpg edit

 

Image:Kings River Explosion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Charity Sadie.jpg edit

The image Image:Charity Sadie.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Informal style of the article edit

I added the template since this whole article is written like "the story of tom king" rather than being an objective article about a television character. An example is; "Being rich and single made Tom a target for the gold-digging women in the village - regardless of the fact he was old enough to be their fathers". "Gold-diggin women"? Doesn't sound as being NPOV. I also removed some text like "the evil" Robert Sugden. 91.95.6.80 (talk) 11:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply