This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horse racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Horse racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horse racingWikipedia:WikiProject Horse racingTemplate:WikiProject Horse racingHorse racing articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Why is this article being selected for speedy deletion? Just google Tom Dascombe - all the info is there. I have referenced all text from very reliable sources. Please explain the problem someone...
C78270 (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is certainly clear, and well-referenced, that Mr. Dascombe exists and does what it's indicated he does. What is in question is whether he is sufficiently notable to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. At present the only citation that lends any notability is the one from the Daily Telegraph and a single source is not generally sufficient. There is no specific notability standard that can be applied to a racehorse trainer so he will have to meet the general notability guidelines. I'd advise you to trace all the links in this paragraph and see if you can add any further reliable sources to bolster notability. Notability is not generally inherited; although the racehorses mentioned may be notable, it's not automatic that the person who trained them is notable. What would be required is arm's-length, third-party expert sources who state that Mr. Dascombe is notable as a trainer per se. If the article is deleted before you can add further sources, feel free to leave me a note and I'll retrieve the deleted material for you and put it in a place where you can work on it with slightly less urgency. Accounting4Taste:talk21:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
