Talk:Tomé Pires

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 94.220.166.92 in topic Suma oriental unpublished until 1944?

Tomé Piers or Tomé Pires? edit

Piers is not a Portuguese name (which does not mean that wasn't his name...). Couldn't it be Pires? The Ogre 15:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry - Pires is correct and page moved accordingly. Merbabu 01:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suma oriental unpublished until 1944? edit

In this article it is said that the Suma Oriental has not been published until 1944, it even was "lost in an archive". But: I have found an edition of this book, which says it is a reprint of one first published in London 1914 (see: http://asianeds.com/book_cd_details.asp?Cd=429&BC=b). Since there is no evidence given in the article, I would say, this passage has to be removed or anyone who knows more about it should share his knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.166.92 (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply