Talk:Titchwell Marsh

Feedback

Hmm, I'll jot some queries: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Titchwell Marsh is an Royal Society for the Protection of Birds nature reserve... - looks odd having consecutive bluelinks. I figure if you make it " Titchwell Marsh is a nature reserve run by/administered by/owned by Royal Society for the Protection of Birds .." , this allows us to split the bluelinks and also use a passive participle to explain the relationship.

Regarding the headings - they look good apart from the overlinclusive title for section 2 "The reserve" - maybe something more defined like "Layout and facilities" - and some of the access and facilities material would be better juxtaposed to material in the "The reserve" ubersection.

Needs more on flora, if possible

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Titchwell Marsh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 19:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, complies with key MoS elements.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Well referenced to reliable sources, no evidence of OR. Spotchecks show that online sources support statements, assumme good faith for off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Excellent coverage.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitable images, licensed and captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   A pleasure to review this excellent article. I am happy to list it. Will put under Nature reserves, conservation areas and countryside routes sub-section in the Geography and places section.

Comments pre FA

• In the interest of avoiding any hint of bias, you might think about using the complete names of referenced birds ("Pied Avocet", "European Robin") instead of the UK-only shortcuts.
• I'd link Montagu's Harrier and Marsh Harrier, since they're apparently a good part of the reason the reserve was established in the first place.

MeegsC | Talk 14:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Lovely article; minor sentence quibble

This is a lovely article! Congratulations to all concerned. It literally made me want to go there and see the place for myself. I have one minor quibble which is about the way the lead section currently ends: This internationally important reserve is part of the North Norfolk Coast [SSI ...] and is also protected through Natura 2000, Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar listings.. I feel that the "listings" is a bit late, so it's like a German sentence where you have to wait to the end to find out what was going on in the middle! I first read This internationally important reserve is part of the North Norfolk Coast [SSI ...] and is also protected through Natura 2000. ... which left me going "er, what?" Is there any way, please, to restructure this a little so we get the point a bit earlier? I was wondering if something like this could work: This internationally important reserve is part of the North Norfolk Coast [SSI ...] and is also protected through its listings {with/at/something-or-other?} Natura 2000 etc etc. I would have a go myself but I don't know the topic well enough and do not wish to mess it up. Certainly, it will be no disaster if it is left how it is; on the other hand, if another editor reading this understands - perhaps even sympathizes with - my objection and can find an elegant rephrasing then great! Sorry to take up your time reading this and best to all, DBaK (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Titchwell Marsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AxoEYZ20?url=http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1001342.pdf to http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1001342.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121216153828/http://environment-agency.gov.uk/research/planning/108980.aspx to http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/research/planning/108980.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Titchwell Marsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719080254/http://west-norfolk.gov.uk/pdf/1390-42b%20Birdwatching2.pdf to http://www.west-norfolk.gov.uk/pdf/1390-42b%20Birdwatching2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425150952/http://www.rspb-westnorfolk.org/titchwell.html to http://www.rspb-westnorfolk.org/titchwell.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425161047/http://www.atropos.info/news.html to http://www.atropos.info/news.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Titchwell Marsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1001342.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729202427/http://www.northpennines.org.uk/Lists/DocumentLibrary/Attachments/156//Watervoles.pdf to http://www.northpennines.org.uk/Lists/DocumentLibrary/Attachments/156//Watervoles.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426064358/http://78.46.109.169/changes-at-rspb-titchwell-marsh to http://78.46.109.169/changes-at-rspb-titchwell-marsh

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Titchwell Marsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107152532/http://www.architecture.com/Awards/RIBAAwards/Winners2011/East/Eastwinners2011.aspx to http://www.architecture.com/Awards/RIBAAwards/Winners2011/East/Eastwinners2011.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)