External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tintern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent correspondance with Will Davies, the CADW inspector for the area, associates recent culverting discoveries with the 1568 expansion of the site to produce standardised artillery, controlling the tail race from several existing wire mills on the Angidy, which he thinks "early post-mediaeval". That then links to site to the Ordnance Board site at Monmouth, which Shakespeare recognises as predating 1415. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.217.82.74 (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tunnel edit

This might be added here: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/electricians-discover-secret-medieval-tunnels-180977169/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.129.238 (talk) 08:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Possibly, but there is a lot of uncertainty about the tunnel, and whether it is medieval or later, so any mention should take care not to make it sound unduly exciting! Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply