Talk:Tin Mine Falls

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Elevation edit

Topographic Maps of New South Wales do not support the claim that the falls were measured to be 459 meters tall. The maps indicate the falls to be closer to 220 meters in total height. Exactly how Dr. John Peace measured the falls is not known. The World Waterfall Database has seen absolutely zero evidence to corroborate the claim of 459 meters, and aerial photography viewed on Google Earth supports the idea that the falls are a series of smaller falls and cascades nowhere near as tall as is claimed.


Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re-Write edit

This page needs to be re-written. It seriously is written in a way that resembles a talk page more than an article. Nice images though, I knew at some point someone would figure this bad boy out! AndrewEnns (talk) 05:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The cleanup tag was on the section "Measuring the falls" for some six years, which seems long enough. It was an unfixable case of WP:OR. Section deleted. — Brianhe (talk) 04:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tin Mine Falls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply