Talk:Timothy I of Seleucia-Ctesiphon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Syriac Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Assyria Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date of birth edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has been placed in the category '727 Births'. What is the evidence that Timothy was born in 727? As far as I remember, neither Bar Hebraeus, Mari, Amrus or Sliba mentions his date of birth.

Djwilms (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rename edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can someone rename this article please? He is normally referred to as Timothy I of Baghdad. See: [1] for many examples. Thank you. 2.97.130.241 (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

This would appear to be true, and supplies a natural disambiguation. Is there any objection to this move? William Avery (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic