Talk:Timeline of dendrochronology timestamp events

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

not dendro derived edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I assumed that the timestamps would be from continuous dendro records. How can this:

"Two Creeks Buried Forest State Natural Area; (the date radiocarbon dated); advances and retreats of the Wisconsin glaciation, but tree life-spans dated to an average of 60–year life-spans"

fit here, the date is a radio-carbon date. The oldest certain dendro date then is c.5k years? Anyone got citations for these things? Pbhj (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Confusing article name edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

timestamp seems confusing. This seeems to be a list of datings derived from dendrochronology. Could rename ? - Rod57 (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Moreover, the article appears to be very poorly sourced. I don't know what the entries in this list mean. What is the year 0 doing on it, for example? (There was no year 0, and I fail to see how it could be a timestamp for anything.) KarlFrei (talk) 18:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removing Lake Bracciano entry edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 5690 BC date for the earliest occupation of the Neolithic settlement around Lake Bracciano appears to be an approximate Carbon-14 date that has subsequently been misreported in English language publications as a dendrochronological date. See this publication in Italian by the original archeologists. As such I'm removing this entry from the article.

Qmwnebrvtcyxuz (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic