Talk:Timashevsk

Latest comment: 1 year ago by ModernDayTrilobite in topic Requested move 11 January 2023

Requested move 11 January 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Rough consensus that Timashevsk is the WP:COMMONNAME by a sufficiently large margin to override the guidance in WP:RUS. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 17:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


TimashyovskTimashevskWP:COMMONNAME per Google Books Ngram.  —Michael Z. 14:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Google Advanced Book Search results, per WP:SET:
Google Scholar results:
 —Michael Z. 21:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


Note: WikiProject Russia has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose any renaming of obscure Russian-language terms contrary to WP:RUS based on alleged English COMMONNAME. I might support changing the default transliteration of ⟨ё⟩ to e rather than yo (despite the latter being more phonetically correct), but going piecewise like this is futile (and borders on disruption). No such user (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    On retrospect, I'm going to support this one. Transliteration ⟨ё⟩ to ⟨e⟩ is near-universal, and disparity in search results is overwhelming. Besides, transliteration "Timashyovsk" is just as misleading – it's pronounced "Timashovsk" (which yields a few results). If moved, we should include Timashyovsky DistrictTimashevsky District as well. No such user (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.