Talk:Til I Forget About You
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 9 December 2022
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Big Time Rush. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 9 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Til I Forget About You (song) to Til I Forget About You. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 9 December 2022 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Til I Forget About You (song) → Til I Forget About You – Only article with this title so it doesn't need to have "(song)" in the title. FanDePopLatino (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- redirect to Big Time Rush. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @@In ictu oculi: why do you want it redirected? The song was originally redirected because it was created without proper sources to establish notability. The article was recreated with sources, charts, and a certification to meet notability. This discussion is not about deleting the song's article but instead it is to move it (change the article's name).FanDePopLatino (talk) 21:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: There's no need to redirect the page, the song is notable enough to keep the article here on Wikipedia: it appeared in weekly and annual charts, it earned certifications and with a Google search you can find some publications in which it appears. I also believe that there is no need to keep the (song) in the title, because as already mentioned, it is the only article on Wikipedia with that name.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 15:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support, excessive disambiguation, should be uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 20:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.