Talk:Tight junction

Latest comment: 1 year ago by JW302 in topic Tunicates

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dean1.0.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2018 and 20 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kjorgen4. Peer reviewers: Tlunchman, Yarrd86.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Questions edit

Support. As I understand it, the terms zona occludens and tight junction are interchangeable.

Grammar question: I'm no physiologist, but isn't "zonula occludens" singular? The plural should be "zonulae occludentes."

Yes zona occludens and tight junction are interchangeable. I don't know a thing about latin (so somebody with some knowledge should answer the question above) but I have never seen the term "zonulae occludentes" and since it is not used it shouldn't be in the article. --hroest 15:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Tight junction" is the same thing as "zonula occludens." The plural of the latter is "zonulae occludentes." These terms are widely available in the tight junction literature.

Great stuff in the French version of this article edit

if anyone is looking to improve this there is plenty of inspiration. Richiez (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tight junction/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Great figures! Bravo

Last edited at 17:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Alterations to first praragraph edit

Tight junctions, also known as occluding junctions or zonulae occludentes (singular, zonula occludens) are multiprotein junctional complex whose general function is to prevent leakage of transported solutes and water and seals the paracellular pathway. Tight junctions may also served as leaky pathways by forming selective channels for small cations, anions, or water. Tight junctions are present only in vertebrates. The corresponding junctions that occur in invertebrates are septate junctions.

(I would like to suggest some alterations to the first paragraph to expand upon the general function of tight junctions and include some references from this paper http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06485.x/abstract)

--BearBait 21:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Tunicates edit

The intro says that “Tight junctions are present mostly in vertebrates (with the exeption of Tunicates).” However, Tunicates are invertebrates.

Clarify?

CielProfond (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I haven't found anything within recent years to specify this. There was one research article I was able to look at from 1986. I think we should just exclude this part until we can get more citations. JW302 (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

JAM edit

The link that leads JAM proteins only brings it to one particular JAM. There is another article that would be much better. Junctional adhesion moleculeJW302 (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: BYU-Biophysics, CELL 568 edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JW302 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Editorzcj, F4at96.

— Assignment last updated by Editorzcj (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply