Talk:Tiger Tyson

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

ClockStrikes9 improper edits themselves vandalism

edit

First of all, since when is a nom for speedy deletion considered vandalism? Second, why did you remove the unreferenced tag without adding any references? Where are the references? You don't remove an unreferenced tag without adding any references. Your sweeping edits without explanation or good reason are themselves vandalism.

Unless you can improve the article, you will leave the speedy delete tag in place and allow an admin to decide whether this article should stand. And until you can add references you will allow the unreferenced tag to stay.

71.127.234.51 14:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I might be inclined to take this a tad bit more seriously, if the person making these value judgments about the merit of this article were posting under an actual user name, instead of a random I.P. address. Tiger Tyson is a well known porn star, who is recognized in his industry. For anyone to claim that this article isn’t notable is not only ignorant, but hypocritical, as there are hundreds of other articles on Wikipedia subjected around other porn stars; yet I don’t see you on a crusade to get any of them removed. Quite frankly, your whole campaign to have this article deleted is insignificant, ridiculous, petty…and yes, it does reek of masked vandalism. - Jtpop 14:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

1977 or 1979?

edit

Both of these years are mentioned as Tiger's birthyear...which is correct? Hilljayne 21:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sourced by IAFD as 1977. GayGuy54 (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced

edit

Yes, a lot of info in this article is unsourced. As with many articles on porn actors, a lot of the material to verify these facts is X-rated, and therefore unsuitable for sourcing purposes on Wikipedia. Most of the unsourced facts in this article, however, are innocuous and not likely to be challenged. Please discuss here if you think an specific unsourced item should be removed. Keep in mind that most of these facts are verifiable by visiting Tyson's official Web sites, linked to in this article. GayGuy54 (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

"X rating" does not stop something being used as a source on Wikipedia. Questions about the sources reliability, however, do. Just thought I'd point that out. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tiger Tyson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply