Talk:Tibet flag case

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gamren in topic 2017

2017 edit

You have a similar editor to Pbsavon, so I do not trust you. Please add reference, because the reference is more credit than you.--Tr56tr (talk) 11:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Whether in the Tibet Post International - a nationalist outlet - or in the Huffington Post, there is no occurrence of the phrase "China's occupation of Tibet" which you insist on keeping. If someone is to provide a reference, it's you. --Elnon (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it didn't even occur to me that "occupation" might be a controversial description. I hope I haven't sparked any contention.__Gamren (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply