![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Months
editUndid anonymous change from six months to three months. If it is indeed three months, please revise while logged in, and document support for your change. Adrade (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Recent changes by Berkeley IP
editI do not believe the recent changes by 169.229.129.238 satisfy our verifiability or neutrality policies. If the lead doesn't reflect the body of the article, then the solution may be to change the body, not to change the lead in violation of those policies. The cited sources do not support the content, and the content appears to cast unnecessary doubt on the validity of the Thurmond Rule. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Rename this.
editThe term Biden rule was used by Senate leadership (majority and opposition) to refer to the nominations of both Garland and Barrett. This page needs to be renamed to the appropriate context of American politics. 2600:100E:BF1A:F47:85E:B7F9:BEEF:84AD (talk) 16:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest keeping the name of the article as it is. But, it should be mentioned in the part about the 2016 controversy that Republicans did refer to it as "the Biden Rule." SlowJog (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)