This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
A fact from Thure Kumlien appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,118 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A recent edit removed all of the references (about 15 in number) to an article in SpeedyLook, noting the removal of all "speedylook's article links used as references, because speedylook is a poor translation of fr:". While I respect the opinions of others, and I acknowledge that the Speedylook entry was clunky at best, it was the only source for over a dozen assertions of fact in this article (couldn't find other sources); those assertions are now unsourced. It seems to me that a "poor translation" of an otherwise solid source is still better than no source at all. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The section "Bibliography" normally contains a list of works by the article's subject, but the link is an article about Kumlien. Should it be renamed "sources", as I supposed it has been used as such? --Tjärblomster (talk) 11:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
