Talk:Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks)
![]() | Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll review this article sometime tonight. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found:
- "was written by series creator David Wolstencroft, and directed by Bharat Nalluri." comma not needed
- Done. -- Matthew RD 14:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- "Section D also learn that Kane may be setting up the attacks in memory of her husband," I'm not sure if "in memory of" is right since he's still alive albeit on death row, but I'm not sure of an alternative.
- How about replace "memory" with "tribute." I'm pretty sure they use that term to people who are still alive. -- Matthew RD 14:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Most Pilot GAs and FAs have information about casting added in alongside filming and production stuff. There's a little bit sprinkled in, but at least the main actors should have some information added on them being decided for the roles so long as it exists.
- I'll see what I can do. -- Matthew RD 14:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- "because of the photos before the release of the series, the audience were to assume that Zoe would have long brunette hair, where in fact she'd have short blonde hair." sounds a bit odd as worded. maybe just simply say that she had long brunette hair in the release photos but blonde hair in the show? I presume that's what's meant.
- Done, I think. -- Matthew RD 14:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yup, tribute sounds good. Just let me know when the casting issue is addressed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to report, I could not find a lot of information. The first series DVD has lots of interviews with the cast, but they didn't talk about how they were casted, except Peter Firth mentioned he was attracted to the series because of one of the writers' involvements. The Presspack did not shed more light either, just saying they were advised by ex-MI5 officers. Do you think I should run on what little info I have anyway? -- Matthew RD 14:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Any little bit helps, so we can use that. If that's all there is then that's all there is, I'll pass upon the addition. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- Matthew RD 15:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- Matthew RD 15:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Any little bit helps, so we can use that. If that's all there is then that's all there is, I'll pass upon the addition. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 14:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to report, I could not find a lot of information. The first series DVD has lots of interviews with the cast, but they didn't talk about how they were casted, except Peter Firth mentioned he was attracted to the series because of one of the writers' involvements. The Presspack did not shed more light either, just saying they were advised by ex-MI5 officers. Do you think I should run on what little info I have anyway? -- Matthew RD 14:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thou Shalt Not Kill (Spooks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140701091700/http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly-top-30?_s=4 to http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly-top-30?_s=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)