Talk:Thornton Creek

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Always beleive in hope in topic References a mess

Untitled edit

Summary: + ft, + cit so cl, rephrased, + cite web, + headings; see Talk.
Explication: Added verified short full text (ft), added citations so cleaned up, rephrased per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MoS) so conguent with respect to (wrt) sources, added cite web template, added headings Habitat, Neighborhoods of, and See also; see Discussion. Existing writing was retained as much as could.
Cf. (see also) Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.

References having authors have conventional short form citation: <ref>[Author last name, {etc. if more than one}], [page numbers]</ref>, with complete reference in Bibliography, less page numbers.

"External Links" -> "Further Reading", per MoS Further reading/external links.
"Retrieved [date]", since on-line reference links can break, (per Embedded links).

--GoDot 09:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Haller Lake edit

The claim in the lede that Haller Lake is a source for Thornton Creek is unsourced, and contradicts at least one watershed map. Please feel free to contribute to a discussion of this topic at Talk:Haller Lake, Seattle#Thornton Creek.—Myasuda (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The links at [1] and [2] show that Haller Lake's watershed is disjoint from Thornton Creek. From this evidence, as well as the other links provided at Talk:Haller Lake, Seattle#Thornton Creek, I'll proceed to remove the statement that "Its source is Haller Lake" from the article.—Myasuda (talk) 01:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Thornton Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Thornton Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Human population edit

200,000 people in the watershed sounds awfully high: that would be roughly 1/3 of the city. Has someone got a more specific citation for that (e.g. a quoted, specific statement)? - Jmabel | Talk 00:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

75,000, it's not a great article so if you see something wrong feel free to improve it. Always beleive in hope (talk) 23:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

References a mess edit

Why is there a references and a bibliography? and more importantly why are is there a different reference for every tributary source? I'm not sure what to do about the reference problems because I don't want to remove the references with information actually in the article but it's a real mess. Always beleive in hope (talk) 23:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply