Talk:Thomas de Buittle

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Jackturner3 in topic GA review
Good articleThomas de Buittle has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The prose could stand some further work before the article is promoted much beyond GA. For example, the use of semicolons should be curtailed, and more caution should be utilized with commas.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I am placing the article on hold in the expectation that the problems mentioned above can be cleaned up. jackturner3 (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've attempted to address thy concerns. Inform me if this isn't enough. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Based on these changes, I hereby promote this article -- jackturner3 (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply