Talk:Thomas Weisel Partners

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

FT: "Errant banks perfect the waiting game" edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When Eliot Spitzer brought his famous case against Wall Street analysts, he initially alleged that 12 banks had skewed their research to win investment banking business. But when he and US regulators unveiled their $1.4bn settlement in April 2003, only 10 banks were included. Regulators excluded Deutsche Bank to look at more evidence. But the 12th, Thomas Weisel Partners, dropped out because it did not like the terms.

By the time these last two settled, in 2004, the media and the public had lost interest. Now, when you search Google for Mr Spitzer’s analysts probe, the first page refers to only 10 banks, and Weisel’s Wikipedia entry does not even mention the issue.

FT (May 27, 2016)

--Kurt Jansson (talk) 10:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic