Talk:Thomas Sanchez

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 70.226.166.178 in topic copyright violation?

Untitled edit

Copied from: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling:

Today i stumbled across this article (Thomas Sanchez) at first i was gonna wikify and stub it, but then i started to read it and (please feel free to prove me wrong) its just doesnt seem true what so ever... i just cant believe someone wrote all that, considering its all false, it just seems really, really wierd. Anyway i just ask for one of you to read it and decide wether or not it should be put up for deletion --- Paulley

It's either false or non-notable. vfd --Jtalledo (talk) 00:18, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I agree; either it's a fabrication or simply some guy not important enough to be in Wikipedia. I've marked the page as disputed; I can't find any reference to the guy apart from Wikipedia and its mirrors. VFD. --Chrysaor 19:15, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • I think so too. adding a explain significance tag to the article as well. (Lbmixpro)

I don't understand any of this article. It starts weirdly and the whole tone is that of victimization. I was looking for Thomas Sanchez, the author of Rabbit Boss. (Earthsprite)

copyright violation? edit

The article's text was substantially the same as the Catholic Encyclopedia (the "external link" of the article), and the CE contains a copyright notice, so I've marked this as copyvio. N. Paul Inast 03:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but note that the Catholic Encyclopedia was published in 1913, so it is well passed the point where the text has become public domain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.166.178 (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply