Talk:Thomas S. Riley
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kingsif in topic Did you know nomination
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas S. Riley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Thomas S. Riley has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Thomas S. Riley (pictured), the son of Irish immigrants, was West Virginia's 11th attorney general and chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party State Executive Committee? Source 1: Son of Irish immigrants, Source 2: Attorney General (p. 401), Source 3: Attorney General (p. 388), Source 4: Chairperson (p.320)
- Reviewed: Rodin Studios
Improved to Good Article status by West Virginian (talk). Self-nominated at 13:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC).
- I made one minor copyedit ("serve" is often abused for simply "doing the job one is paid for"), but that's it: the article is absolutely fine, and I agree with the GA review (which seems to have been done in a conscientious and comprehensive manner). All aspects of the hook are properly verified. It's good to go. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)