Talk:Thomas S. Hinde/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 01:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• Early years

• First paragraph is not fully referenced
  • Changed. Added References.
• Second paragraph is not fully referenced
  • Changed. Added References.
• "After the conversion of his mother and older sister Susannah in 1798" -> "After a conversion with his mother and older sister Susannah in 1798"
  • Changed.

• Newspaper publisher

• Last paragraph is not fully sourced
  • Changed. Added References.

• Conversion to Methodism

• "My bowels, my bowels!" needs to be sourced
  • Changed. Added Reference.
• "accused of offenses...."" - not an ellipsis
  • Changed. Deleted ellipsis.
• Remove space before reference after ""...doing God service." [10]"
  • Changed. Deleted Space.
• Move the image with the caption "Methodist circuit rider on horseback" upwards to avoid sandwiching the text
  • Changed. Moved Image.

• Indian affairs

• Paragraph beginning with "One portion of Hinde's property..." is unreferenced.
  • Changed. Added Reference.

• War of 1812

• "His participation was motivated by his association with Harrison, who was then the Governor of the Indiana Territory located in Vincennes near Mount Carmel. Both Hinde and Harrison originated from well-known Virginian families and were close in age." is unreferenced
  • Changed. Added References.

• Real estate disputes

• Initial paragraph unreferenced
  • Changed. Added References.
• Johnson v. M’Intosh
• Majority is unreferenced.
  • Changed. Added References.
• Hinde v. Vattier

• Last sentence is unsourced
  • Changed. Added References.

• Later life and legacy

• First paragraph is entirely without sources
  • Changed. Added References.
• Same for the paragraph before the "Death" subsection
  • Changed. Added References.

• References

• Ideally, refs #2, #14, #15, #16, #16, #19, #21, #23, #31, #33 and #34 would have page numbers in the citations.
  • Changed. Added as many page numbers as possible.

• That's all I've found for now. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 01:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• I'm satisfied with the changes. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)