Talk:Thomas Preston (scientist)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kleuske in topic The Preston Magnet

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Thomas Preston (scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Preston Magnet edit

In an earlier version of this article, a user had contributed a nice paragraph on the magnet that Preston used in his discovery of the anomalous Zeeman Effect. The photo looks legit, along with the information provided, as can be checked from Fig.6 of the following article: Unfulfilled renown: Thomas Preston (1860-1900) and the Anomalous Zeeman Effect I would suggest embedding this information and photo back into the article in some form, it is an interesting magnet; having such a device in 1890s made all the difference in being able to measure the line splitting.

 
@Erkcan: I removed that section because it was unsourced. If you have good sources, feel free to write about it. Kleuske (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply