Talk:Thomas Oxley (neurologist)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 20 April 2021

Requested move 20 April 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus for alt move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply



– There are two articles for two different individuals named Thomas Oxley. This subject seems to be more significant than the other Thomas Oxley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Oxley). Should this article have the official title of "Thomas Oxley" and the other article be "Thomas Oxley (Surgeon of the Straits Settlement)"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abridgelv123 (talkcontribs) 16:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

This comment was formatted incorrectly so I'm reposting for other user with correct formatting) Hankscorpio33 (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Further reformatted as a multi-page move. — BarrelProof (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Move to Thomas Oxley (neurologist) and Thomas Oxley (British surgeon). No primary topic. The neurologist also appears to be a qualified surgeon, so the national identifier for the latter is necessary, but the proposed disambiguator is unnecessarily verbose. The current disambiguator for the former is poor, as he certainly isn't a Mount Sinai Hospital! -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support this alternative. 162 etc. (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support Necrothesp variation. — BarrelProof (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.