Talk:Thomas Jouannet

File:Dunantanimation.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Dunantanimation.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Dunantanimation.gif) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Complaint

Unsubstantiated Personal attack. Accusing someone of vandalism and being paid to edit, without evidence, is a serious breach of WP:AGF. It also does not related to improving this article. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Significant internal vandalism against this page, under the coverage of "wikipedia policy". Online harassment but on REAL money. A single zealous editor - Drmies with 1249 deleted pages as his/her stated predominant activity at unaware donors expense - that is an emblem of what wikipedia has become - a costly fraud. The w trustful benefactors[1] imperiously need to be made conscious of this expensive mockery. Despite many complaints, the w board openly encourages, by ambiguous rules, the frenzy of deletion of tons of hard-worked material, most frequently even without being read. Money earned with backbreaking effort by well-intentioned sponsors are easily wasted for an excessive bureaucracy way out of control, causing such a high number of stubs and missing pages, in an undisclosed quantum of deleted bytes. By deducting[2] these donations, the State itself also became a victim of this imposture. To make public this authorized vandalism, particularly to actual and potential donors and, not less important, to the IRS, is my top priority from now on. Coagulans (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Drmies' edits were proper and firmly within policy. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)