 | A fact from Thomas Hervey (landowner) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
DYK
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Edge3 (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
_-_Sir_Thomas_Hervey_(1625%E2%80%931694),_KT_(after_Joseph_Brook)_-_851806_-_National_Trust.jpg)
Hervey in 1690
- ... that Samuel Pepys wrote of Royal Navy Commissioner Sir Thomas Hervey: (pictured) "a coxcombe he is and will never be better in the business of the Navy"?
Source: Samuel Pepys, diary for 7 November 1666, pepysdiary.com- ALT1:... that Pepys recorded a dinner with Thomas Hervey (pictured), John Mennes, and Lord Brouncker, at which "very merry we were, Sir Thomas Harvy being a very drolle"?
Source: Samuel Pepys, diary for 7 June 1665, pepysdiary.com
- ALT1:... that Pepys recorded a dinner with Thomas Hervey (pictured), John Mennes, and Lord Brouncker, at which "very merry we were, Sir Thomas Harvy being a very drolle"?
- Reviewed: The Jumbie Bird
Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 09:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC).
New article is 2,008 characters long and nominated two days after its creation. No copyvios detected (high confidence of violation due to direct quotes that have all been cited) and duplication detector check of online sources[1][2][3] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF book scans and offline sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 156 characters long (ALT1 is 161); both are under the 200 character max. limit and are interesting. Refs 6 and 4 (verifying the main hook and ALT1, respectively) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
