Talk:Thomas Gilbert (politician)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There seems to be a name-confusion. Several links on a captain who discovered pacfic islands in 1788 (Gilbert Islands, Matthew and Hunter Islands lead to this Thomas Gilbert. Is this really the same person? It seems that the Thomas Gilbert mentioned here has no naval background.--Legalides 12:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes I believe you are correct, nothing I read about Thomas Gilbert said anything about him discovering any pacific islands, I think the person who wrote the article is confused, or just plain lazy (Nick Pollman 5:29, April 29th, 2008)

Add topic