Talk:Thomas Duncan-Watt
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Innocent comandante in topic Controversy Section
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Controversy Section edit
User:Thomasduncanwatt, please refrain from removing the well-referenced content without providing proper explanation. Innocent comandante (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- user:74.73.134.140, can you tell me exatctly why your effort to remove the content appears to be strikingly similar with User:Thomasduncanwatt and user:103.217.166.79. You are apparently trying to whitewash a well-referenced section which is not allowed.Innocent comandante (talk) 11:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
User:71.105.48.36, please refrain from removing the well-referenced content without valid explanation. Your edits bear a strong resemblance to those of User:Wikicorrector3