This article uses a good deal off prejudicial language. For instance, describing Thomas Darcy's actions vis-a-vis Wolsey as "shameful," or characterizing the method of execution for traitors as "barbarous." While I do not, personally, disagree with such assessments, the language is prejudicial and has a negative impact on the overall quality of the article. If the matter is indeed factual and clear, the reader will draw their own conclusions without being directed by the author as to what they should be.
